News

LiveLaw52m
Suo Motu Case Over Lokpal Jurisdiction To Decide Complaint Against HC Judge Placed Before CJI
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court today placed before CJI Sanjiv Khanna the suo motu case initiated against a Lokpal ...
LiveLaw43m
Entitlement To ACP/MACP Benefits Is Based On Completion Of Qualifying Service, Not On Additional Qualifications: Jharkhand HC
The Jharkhand High Court bench comprising Justice Ananda Sen held that under the ACP/MACP Schemes, financial upgradation must ...
LiveLaw16m
Set-Off Period Cannot Be Taken Into Account For Calculating Remission: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court held that set – off period cannot be taken into account while calculating days for remission.For ...
LiveLaw45m
In Cases Of Cross-FIRs, Unfair To Quash One FIR While Probing The Other; Both Be Investigated Together : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court yesterday (April 29) ruled that in cases involving cross-FIRs, it would be imprudent to quash one FIR and ...
LiveLaw33m
POCSO Offence Is Committed Against Society, Accepting Defence Of Subsequent Marriage With Victim Will Defeat Purpose Of Act: Madras HC
While reversing the acquittal of a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, the Madras High ...
LiveLaw35m
S. 8 IBC | Service Of Demand Notice On Corporate Debtor's Key Managerial Personnel Is Valid To Trigger Insolvency Process : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 29) upheld the delivery of a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) to the corporate debtor's Key Managerial ...