Paradox of voting - Wikipedia
The paradox of voting, also called Downs' paradox, is that for a rational and egoistic voter (Homo economicus), the costs of voting will normally exceed the expected benefits.
Paradox of Voting: Explanation and Examples - Philosophy Terms
What is the Paradox of Voting? The Paradox of Voting is a tricky idea that people study in subjects like economics, politics, and even psychology. It first came from a guy named Anthony Downs, an economist, who wrote about it in 1957.
Paradox of Voting - Encyclopedia.com
The most common form of the paradox of voting refers to a situation where the outcome of majority-rule voting over a discrete set of candidates produces no clear winner, even though each individual voter has a clear and transitive rank ordering of preferences over the …
The Ethics and Rationality of Voting (Stanford Encyclopedia ...
Jul 28, 2016 · One popular response to the paradox of voting is to posit that voters are not trying to determine who wins, but instead trying to change the “mandate” the elected candidate receives.
Condorcet paradox - Wikipedia
In social choice theory, Condorcet's voting paradox is a fundamental discovery by the Marquis de Condorcet that majority rule is inherently self-contradictory.
Arrow’s Theorem - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 13, 2014 · This is the “paradox of voting”. Discovered by the Marquis de Condorcet (1785), it shows that possibilities for choosing rationally can be lost when individual preferences are aggregated into social preferences.
Paradox of voting - Oxford Reference
6 days ago · The paradox is that electoral turnout is relatively high. Possible explanations include irrationality, social customs, and social duties. See also collective choice; majority voting.
Paradox Of Voting Definition & Examples - Quickonomics
Apr 29, 2024 · Understanding the paradox of voting enriches the discourse on democracy and participation, suggesting that the act of voting encompasses much more than the pursuit of influencing electoral outcomes. It involves a complex interplay of rational considerations, social influences, and deeply held values, all of which contribute to the democratic ...
Paradox of Voting - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Because one vote has but an infinitesimal influence on the electoral outcome, the rational behavior, at first sight, would be not to bother going to the polls, and since Downs, a large body of literature has been devoted to what appeared as the ‘voting paradox.’
This article brings together multiple of these attempts to explain the paradox of voting. Most centrally, it combines the longstanding idea that voting may be a consumption good that people enjoy for its own sake with bounded rationality theory's idea that limitations of